In this study factorial design based on the response surface method was adopted to optimize effective factors for the release of the drug from the microspheres. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and all statistical analysis were also performed using the software. Calculation of the effects was performed. The significant effects would constitute the model. The F-value was then calculated by comparing the treatment variance with

the error variance. The multiple correlation co-efficient was calculated which is a measure of the amount of variation about the mean, which is explained by the model. The main effects and interactions are plotted and results interpreted. All assumptions underlying the ANOVA are checked. For statistical purposes, the assumption is selleck chemical made that residuals are normally distributed check details and independent with constant variance. Eudragit microspheres of tinidazole were successfully prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation technique. The results shown in Table 3 indicates that optimum concentration of surfactant (1% w/v) and stirring speed (2500 rpm) showed higher percent of entrapment

efficiency while change in stirring speed up to optimum range and change the surfactant concentration up to optimum range change the percent entrapment efficiency (Table 4). Also the percentage yield of microspheres of all formulations was found in the range of 68.6–77.5 %. The microspheres were characterized for particle size analysis within range of 585.6 μm–986 μm (Table 4). The FTIR spectra of

pure drug, Eudragit and tinidazole microspheres were shown in (Fig. 1). It shows that no incompatibility reactions took place between drug and excipients. The value of angle of repose of formulation within the range of 17°.97′ ± 0.51–26°.22′ ± 0.22 indicating Dichloromethane dehalogenase good flow properties for the microspheres. The bulk density values ranged between 0.148 ± 0.001 and 0.278 ± 0.004 gm/cm3. The tapped density values ranged between 0.206 ± 0.002 and 0.401 ± 0.03 (gm/cm). The Carr’s index values ranged between 17.55 ± 3.0 % and 42.80 ± 1.2% and Hausner’s ratio values ranged between 1.2140 ± 0.04 to 1.7148 ± 0.08 which can described by Table 5. The in vitro release study was carried out by buffer change method to mimic the GIT environment. Drug release for the initial 2 h i.e. in 0.1 N HCL, the drug release was found to be low in all cases. Then drug release is found 92.74% at the end of 8 h in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, shown in Fig. 2. The produced microspheres were spherical, non aggregated with rough and porous surface, as shown in scanning electron micrographs (Fig. 3). The surface of microspheres was rough due to arising as a trace of solvent evaporation during the process. ANOVA results indicated that concentration of surfactant and stirring speed showed individual effect on % drug release. There is no significant interaction between surfactant and stirring speed.