05) with range of motion at six months ( Table 3). However, only 1% to 17% of the variation in range of motion was explained by these predictors. Multivariate analysis: As several of the candidate predictors were highly correlated with each other, only five of the candidate

predictors (age, pre-morbid function, strength, spasticity, and pain) were entered into the multivariate analysis ( Table 4). Muscle strength was the only predictor selected in more than 80% of bootstrap samples. Even when all five predictors were forced into the model, they only explained 6% to 20% of variation in contracture development (adjusted r2 of full model for elbow extension = 0.19, wrist extension = 0.20, ankle dorsiflexion = 0.06). This study provides the first robust estimates of the incidence of contractures in a representative sample of patients presenting to hospital with stroke. The data indicate that contractures Endocrinology antagonist are common; half the cohort (52%) developed at least one contracture. Contractures are most common at the shoulder and hip, and more common in those with moderate to severe strokes (NIHSS > 5). The data do not provide any further guidance on which patients 5-FU nmr are most susceptible to contractures. It is widely believed that factors such as strength, pain, spasticity, and severity

of stroke help predict contractures yet in our models none of these factors explain more than 20% of variation in range of motion at six months. Few cohort studies have investigated the incidence of contractures after stroke (Fergusson et al 2007). Current estimates of the incidence proportion of contractures vary from 23% to 60% in the year after stroke (Pinedo and de la Villa 2001, Sackley et al 2008). Direct comparisons of our estimates to these studies are difficult due to the

difference in characteristics of cohorts and lack of detailed information regarding measurement and definitions of contractures. However, our estimates broadly align with those of earlier studies. Our estimates may have been higher if we had measured incidence of contractures at one year rather than six months after stroke. It is not clear why we were not better able to predict those susceptible to contractures. The predictors were chosen because they are believed to be associated with the development of contractures. Interestingly, even spasticity, the which is widely believed to predict contractures (Ada et al 2006), was not a good predictor (it was selected in only 25% to 48% of bootstrap samples). This was despite the high incidence of spasticity at baseline (25 elbows, 11 wrists, 21 ankles). Pain was arguably a better predictor than spasticity (selected in a greater number of bootstrap samples than spasticity) even though few joints were painful (4 elbows, 2 wrists, 6 ankles). It is also possible that our failure to predict contractures could have been due to errors associated with the measurement of either predictors or outcomes (contractures).