Although the subjects of the present study were volunteers from one area of Japan, which was acknowledged as a limitation of the study, they may not be significantly different from the general population. Second, we agree with Dr. Kawada on the limitation of HOMA-IR. As we wrote in the article, the associations between undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) and glucose metabolism indices were considerably attenuated when 176 participants on drug therapy for diabetes mellitus were excluded from the analysis and remained significant between ucOC and FPG or HbA1c and, therefore, not significant between ucOC and HOMA-IR. In addition, when

we excluded 106 men whose FPG levels exceeded 140 mg/dl from the analysis, according to the opinion of Dr. Kawada, no significant association was observed between ucOC and

HOMA-IR. Therefore, we admit that the result including selleck chemicals participants with hyperglycemia was interpreted with caution. Because of limitations of HOMA-IR, we did not use it as the primary outcome of our study. The main result of our study was that ucOC was associated with glucose metabolism while carboxylated osteocalcin was not, and this did not alter even if the result using HOMA-IR selleck screening library was not significant. Conflicts of interest None. References 1. Iki M, Tamaki J, VX-680 nmr Fujita Y, Kouda K, Yura A, Kadowaki E, Sato Y, Moon JS, Tomioka K, Okamoto N, Kurumatani N (2012) Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin levels are inversely associated with glycemic status and insulin resistance in an elderly Japanese male population: Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Study. Osteoporos Int 23:761–770. doi:10.​1007/​s00198-011-1600-7

PubMedCrossRef 2. Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2011) The National Health and Nutrition Survey 2010. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo”
“Erratum to: Osteoporos Int DOI 10.1007/s00198-013-2332-7 The legends for Figs. 2 and 3 appeared in the correct places but were accompanied by the wrong illustrations: Fig. 2 legend by Fig. 3 illustrations, and Fig. 3 legend by Fig. 2 illustrations. The two figures are reproduced here in their correct form. Fig. 2 Hip fracture rate. 95 % confidence intervals around point estimate. Note the early separation of the two cohorts with a lower fracture rate for risedronate than for alendronate during the early phase (6–12 months) of treatment Fig. 3 Nonvertebral fracture rate. DCLK1 95 % confidence intervals around point estimate. Note the early separation of the two cohorts with a lower fracture rate for risedronate than for alendronate during the early phase (6–12 months) of treatment”
“Introduction Osteoporosis in men is increasingly recognized as a major public health problem [1]. Although osteoporosis is less common in men than in women, it has been estimated that around 30 % of hip fractures occur in males and one out of five men aged 60 years will experience an osteoporotic fracture during their remaining lifetime [2, 3].