Works from our laboratory and others have previously demonstrated that radiation response is enhanced by blocking the VEGF signaling pathway

using small molecule VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as ZD6474 [11], SU6668 [12] and PTK787/ZK222584 [13], or by directly targeting tumor blood vessels with vascular targeting agents such as ZD6126 [14, 15] and combretastatin [16]. The anti-tumor effect of this combination approach is consistent with the two-compartment model described by Folkman [17]. According to this model, tumors are comprised of distinct compartments including tumor cells and endothelial cells. By targeting the endothelial cell compartment, bevacizumab not check details only inhibits the supply of oxygen and nutrients to the tumor, but also interrupts the “paracrine effect” by inhibiting endothelial secretion of growth factors such as IGF1, bFGF, and HB-EGF, which can stimulate tumor proliferation. In parallel, by targeting the tumor compartment, radiation kills cancer cells and thereby shuts down their production of “pro-angiogenic” factors, thus indirectly affecting the endothelial compartment. We have also observed that treatment with radiation can inhibit endothelial cell proliferation

and stimulate apoptosis [15] and G2/M arrest (nonpublished data), suggesting direct inhibitory effects of radiation on this compartment. A current question of interest in clinical trial design regards the optimal sequencing of radiation and anti-angiogenic Pevonedistat nmr drugs to achieve maximal benefit. A valid

concern is whether targeting the tumor vasculature will decrease tumor blood perfusion, resulting in tumor hypoxia, Nabilone and thereby diminishing the effects of radiation. To investigate the impact of treatment sequencing on tumor response, we designed sequence experiments as described in Figure 7. In the SCC-1 model, it appeared that tumor control was best achieved with the regimen of radiation followed by bevacizumab. This result supports the hypothesis that hypoxia induced by bevacizumab may hinder radiation effect. However, we found no clear difference between sequence regimens in the H226 tumors. Consistent with our observation in the SCC-1 tumors, preclinical studies have shown that delivering ZD6126 prior to radiation to U87 glioblastoma xenografts resulted in acute drop in tumor oxygen tension and this website attenuation of the killing effects of radiation [18]. Further, in KHT sarcoma models, the strongest anti-tumor activity was achieved when ZD6126 was administered one hour following radiation [14]. These observations suggest a negative impact of ZD6126-induced hypoxia on radiation effect. However, the concept of normalization of tumor vasculature proposed by Jain et al. supports a strategy of using anti-angiogenic drugs to improve efficacy of radiation [19].