While the number of OTUs we observed varied little between ATT and SUS bacteria and the two selleck kinase inhibitor groups shared only one-third of their phylogenetic diversity, the archaeal community that colonized our in situ samplers was a distinct subset of the suspended community. Over 90% of ATT archaeal

sequences were from OTUs that were also detected in the SUS fraction, yet 78% of SUS archaeal sequences were not detected in ATT samples (Table 2). This provides strong evidence that the most active and fastest-growing archaeal populations colonized the initially-sterile sediment contained in our in situ samplers. The phylogenetic distinction between ATT and SUS samples (Figure 3) provides further evidence that this is the case, because no such

differentiation of ATT from SUS would be expected if the Staurosporine attachment of cells to the in situ samplers was driven purely by neutral factors such as random adhesion rather than selective colonization [15, 48]. Sequences related to iron-reducing and sulfate-reducing bacteria are much more predominant among the SIS3 cell line ATT communities when compared to their corresponding SUS communities (Figure 6). Geochemical evidence also supports concurrent iron reduction and sulfate reduction processes in this area of the Mahomet aquifer [17, 22]. The near-absence of these functional populations from SUS groundwater samples suggests that their niche is likely

localized to the surface of mineral grains. This makes sense since available ferric iron was associated with the sediment sand used in the traps. This result is not surprising in the case of iron reducers, due to the highly insoluble nature of ferric iron minerals expected in the Mahomet (pH = 7.1–7.9). Iron reducers such as Geobacter require some mechanism of physical attachment to ferric minerals in order to respire [49]. Sulfate, conversely, is highly soluble, cAMP meaning sulfate reducers do not necessarily require attachment to aquifer sediment in order to respire. The greater abundance of apparent sulfate-reducing bacteria in ATT samples relative to SUS may occur because these organisms benefit from proximity to iron reducers, whose generation of ferrous iron prevents toxic sulfide from accumulating in solution [2, 42]. When ferrous iron and sulfide are produced simultaneously, they precipitate as the minerals mackinawite (FeS) and greigite (Fe3S4) [50], limiting the buildup of both reaction products in groundwater and maintaining the thermodynamic drive for each group’s metabolism [51]. Iron reducers have also appeared to benefit from the presence of active sulfate reduction perhaps for the same reason [42]. The predominance of sulfate reducers along with iron reducers in aquifer sediment over groundwater suggests that the two groups may benefit from concurrent respiration.