Two A nidulans mutants, the conditional alcA-PkcA and the mpkA d

Two A. nidulans mutants, the conditional alcA-PkcA and the mpkA deletion mutant selleck showed a hypersensitive

phenotype when exposed to AFPNN5353. This is in agreement to the reported function of cell wall stressing agents, such as CFW or caffeine in S. cerevisiae and A. nidulans [[9, 16, 24, 26, 38, 39]] and to the Penicillium antifungal protein PAF [9]. Importantly, Mpk function is essential for CWIP activation in both, unicellular and filamentous fungi [[10, 16, 40]] and triggers the activation of the transcription factors Rlm1p and SBF which regulate the expression of cell cycle regulated genes and genes involved in the synthesis and remodelling of the fungal cell wall in S. cerevisiae [41, 42]. Similarly, RlmA dependent

induction of the expression of the ags gene was also reported for aspergilli [25]. Importantly, the activation of the CWIP can occur Selleckchem PF-4708671 in a RhoA-dependent, e.g. with CFW [9, 43], or RhoA-independent way, the latter proved for PAF and caffeine [9, 16] and for AFPNN5353 (this study). As proposed by [28] the dominant rhoA E40I allele suffers from a perturbation of its GAP binding domain and downstream effectors of Rho-GAP might be disturbed. Therefore, we hypothesize that Rho-GAP targets might be involved in the toxicity of AFPNN5353 similarly to the mode of action of the P. chrysogenum PAF [9]. Our assumption of the activation of the CWIP by AFPNN5353 was further strengthened by the fact, that AFPNN5353 treatment Selleckchem Z VAD FMK induced agsA expression in the A. niger reporter strain. This result was consistent with the activity of AFP and caspofungin [10], but differed to the function of PAF, where no CWIP activation and no induction of cell wall biosynthesis genes occurred [9]. Therefore, we conclude that AFPNN5353 triggers cell wall remodeling via Pkc/Mpk signalling. We further deduce from our data that similarities and differences exist in the molecular targets and the mode of action of antifungal proteins from filamentous fungi, e.g. AFPNN5353 and PAF – despite their homology.

This phenomenon was also reported for other closely Verteporfin related antifungal proteins, such as the plant defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 from Medicago spp. [44]. Apart from the activation of the CWIP, the perturbation of the Ca2+ homeostasis represents a major mechanistic function of antifungal proteins in sensitive fungi [17, 18]. The intracellular Ca2+ response to AFPNN5353 in A. niger reflected that of the Penicillium antifungal protein PAF in N. crassa [17]. The rapid and sustained increase of the [Ca2+]c resting level depended on a sustained influx of Ca2+ ions from the external medium. Moreover, the AFPNN5353 induced changes in the Ca2+ signature of mechanically perturbed A. niger cells further underlines the disruption of the Ca2+ response and homeostasis by AFPNN5353. The addition of CaCl2 to the growth medium reduced the susceptibility of A.

Comments are closed.