These DNA polymerases perform translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) when a replication fork has collapsed at a blocking lesion, whereas the DNA synthesis by specialized Y-family polymerases Pol IV and Pol V is considered error prone (Sutton & Walker, 2001; Goodman, 2002; Nohmi, 2006). Each of
these three DNA polymerases is specialized for polymerization through different structural classes of DNA damage (Wagner et al., 2002; Nohmi, 2006). Pol II is a high-fidelity enzyme possessing proofreading activity (Cai et al., 1995). However, it can perform error-prone TLS across various types of damage in CDK inhibitor review template DNA (Nohmi, 2006). On the other hand, although Y-family polymerases Pol IV and Pol V are APO866 concentration typically viewed as low-fidelity DNA polymerases, recent studies suggest that they can perform proficient and moderately accurate bypass of particular types of DNA damage (Jarosz et al., 2007). For example, Pol IV is involved in the error-free bypass of cytotoxic alkylating DNA lesions (Bjedov et al., 2007). Escherichia coli cells exposed to UV irradiation have increased mutation frequency that is dependent on Pol V. It was noted already in the late 1970s that E. coli strains lacking genes umuD and umuC are modestly sensitive to UV irradiation and do
not express the UV mutagenesis phenotype (Kato & Shinoura, 1977; Steinborn, 1978). The next studies of the DNA damage-induced mutagenesis and tolerance mechanisms favored the idea that UmuC and UmuD modulate the replicative DNA polymerase, Pol III, and allow it to bypass base damage (Echols & Goodman, 1990; Rajagopalan et al., 1992). Then, in 1999, it was demonstrated that UmuD2′C is a DNA polymerase that provides mutagenic TLS across DNA damage (Reuven et al., 1999; Tang et al., 1999). In the classic model of the E. coli SOS response, the LexA protein represses a set of genes whose products are involved in
a number of different cellular processes, such as inhibition of cell division, nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination or error-prone replication (Courcelle et al., 2001). The SOS response is a tightly regulated process, and it is temporally divided into an early, relatively accurate DNA repair phase and a later, mutagenic damage-tolerance phase (Opperman et Methisazone al., 1999). Pol V (encoded by umuDC genes) is the most error-prone SOS-inducible DNA polymerase of E. coli, and this is a reason why Pol V is induced only about 45 min after the DNA damage and if the damage is not fully repaired by high-fidelity pathways such as NER and homologous recombination (Tippin et al., 2004). The products of the umuD gene play key roles in coordinating the switch from accurate DNA repair to mutagenic TLS. The uncleaved UmuD2 dimer, which appears early after SOS induction, together with UmuC, delays the recovery of DNA replication and cell growth after DNA damage (Opperman et al., 1999).