There are a number of hormonal contraceptive formulations. These are available in a number of routes of administration, dosages, and pharmaceutical preparations. This topic is discussed in detail in the accompanying article by Blish et al. In brief, oral contraceptives are commonly used and result in a cessation of the normal menstrual cycles by providing high enough baseline hormone levels to suppress the hypothalamic pituitary axis and prevent ovulation. There are other forms of combination hormonal contraceptives, DAPT cell line some of which are in a patch form and others that are contained in a vaginal ring. Each of these likely has differing impacts

on genital tract cell trafficking and immune function. Progesterone-containing therapies alter the cervical mucous and the uterine lining. These can be in the form of a pill, a depot injection, or

a long-acting implantable rod. Intrauterine devices likely cause some amount of local inflammatory response and progesterone-containing devices work in multiple pathways. Finally, barrier contraceptive Inhibitor Library solubility dmso methods such as condoms and diaphragms as well as the concomitant use of spermicides may influence genital flora and genital immunity. The impact that oral combination hormonal contraceptives have on HIV risk is an unresolved issue. Oral contraceptives upregulate cervical CCR5 receptors on CD4 T cells.20 There have been human and animal data suggesting that there may be an increased risk of HIV acquisition as well as of HIV disease Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease progression with the use of hormonal contraception.21–23 A recent systematic review examined eight observational studies that did not find an association with HIV progression or transmission but did report the one randomized trial that found an association.24 The authors concluded that while this association deserves further study, the majority of literature

is reassuring. A more recent research letter by Morrison et al. re-analyzed the results of their multicenter cohort study examining this risk. They found that when using a marginal structural modeling statistical technique to limit the time-dependent confounding, there existed a significant association between HIV acquisition risk and hormonal contraceptive use among young women, in particular.23 Given that sex hormones alter many components of genital immunity, it is likely that hormonal contraception has some impact on the innate immunity within the female genital tract. Whether this is a clinically significant impact is yet to be determined but should be considered when conducting such research. Race is known to impact many disease states over and above that which would be expected based on factors such as sociodemographic differences from comparison groups. This appears to involve a potential biologic difference between races that could account for variation in a number of disease presentations.