The CNTs@TiO2 show significantly improved performance in terms of the PX-478 cost capacity (except the first discharge capacity), rate capability, and stability. First, the CNTs@TiO2 showed

a remarkable improvement in cycling performance compared with TiO2. The CNTs@TiO2 delivered a specific capacity of 251.9 mAh/g in the first cycle at a current density of 100 mA g-1. This value is slightly lower than the corresponding Selleck Savolitinib capacity of the TiO2 (263.0 mAh/g); however, the CNTs@TiO2 discharged a higher capacity than TiO2 in the following cycle. One can observe that the discharge capacity gradually decreased in the initial several cycles for both CNTs@TiO2 and TiO2. The CNT@TiO2 electrode achieved a stable capacity of around 195.5 mAh/g in the tenth cycle, while the TiO2 showed a continuous decrease, even in the initial 20 cycles. In fact, when the current density was switched back to 100 mA g-1 in the 81st cycle, the CNTs@TiO2 reached a reversible capacity of around 191.0 mAh g-1 and maintained this capacity in the subsequent cycles, while the TiO2 discharged a corresponding capacity of 163.3 mAh g-1 and showed a slow decrease with the continuous cycling. In addition, the CNTs@TiO2 also exhibited a greatly improved rate performance compared with TiO2,

with varying current densities from 100 to 1,000 mA g-1. For instance, the CNTs@TiO2 maintained a capacity of 110 mAh Methocarbamol g-1 at a current density of as high as 1,000 mA g-1, while the TiO2 only had a capacity of around 85 mAh https://www.selleckchem.com/products/3-methyladenine.html g-1 under this current density. It should be noted that the CNTs@TiO2, as an anode of LIBs, also show improved electrochemical performance compared with the TiO2 nanostructures reported previously [23–25], signifying that the as-designed CNTs@TiO2 show great promise to advance electrochemical performance. In addition, the CNTs@TiO2 can compete

with or outperform the TiO2/CNT composites reported previously in terms of capacity and cycling performance [26, 27]. For instance, the CNTs@TiO2 still retained a specific capacity of about 190 mAh g-1 at a current density of 100 mA g-1[28], which shows a remarkable contrast to the blended TiO2/CNT that only retained a capacity of about 170 mAh g-1 at the same current density. Figure 3 Cyclic performance, rate capability, and scheme of Li + insertion/deinsertion reaction. Cyclic performance and rate capability of TiO2 and CNTs@TiO2 at current densities of 100, 200, 400, and 1,000 mA g-1 (a), and schematic illustration of the Li+ insertion/deinsertion reaction in CNT@TiO2 nanohybrids (b). Figure  3b schematically illustrates the Li+ insertion/deinsertion in CNT@TiO2 nanohybrids and demonstrates advantages of the high electrical conductivity and facile transport of Li+ in CNT@TiO2 nanohybrids.