Notably, 6 of 6, and 5 of 6 mice inoculated with 10,000, and 1,00

Notably, 6 of 6, and 5 of 6 mice inoculated with 10,000, and 1,000 SP cells respectively gave rise to tumors, whereas only 5 of 6, and 2 of 6 inoculations of the same number of the non-SP cells grew tumors, and 5 of 6, and 3 of 6 inoculations of the same

number of MCF-7 cells grew tumors. The tumors derived from non-SP cells were smaller than those from SP cells (ARN-509 concentration Figure 4A, B). Figure 3 Cell sorting results. MCF-7 cells were labeled with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed by flow cytometry (A) or with the addition of Verapamil (B) SP cells appeared as the Hoechst low fraction in the P3 gate about 2.5%, while non-SP cells retained high levels of Hoechst staining in the P4 gate. Both SP and non-SP cells were sorted, respectively. CRT0066101 Table 1 Tumorigenicity of SP Cells in NOD/SCID Xenotransplant Assay Cells injected/fat pad Tumors/injections   5 × 10 6 1 × 10 5 1 × 10 4 1 × 10 3 Unsorted 6/6 5/6 5/6 3/6 SP — — 6/6 5/6 Non-SP — — 5/6 2/6 Table showing the number of tumors generated in NOD/SCID mouse fat pads by SP, non-SP, and unsorted cells. Tumor formation by 1 × 104 H 89 nmr cells was observed

for 6 weeks after injection, whereas tumor formation by 1 × 103 cells was observed for 9 weeks after injection. Figure 4 SP cells were more tumorigenic. (A) Tumor volumes (mean ± SEM) were plotted for 1 × 103 cells of each population (SP, non-SP) injected (n = 6 per group). Tumors derived from SP were larger than those from non-SP. (B) Representative tumors due to injection of SP cells (1 × 104 cells, 1 × 103 cells) compared with non-SP Succinyl-CoA injection (1 × 104 cells, 1 × 103 cells). (C) A representative tumor in a mouse specimen at the SP injection (1 × 103 cells) site, but not at the non-SP injection (1 × 103 cells) site. Histology from the SP injection site ((D), Original magnification, ×200) contained malignant cells, whereas the

non-SP injection site ((E), Original magnification, ×200) revealed only normal mammary tissue. Nine weeks after injection, the injection sites of 1 × 103 tumorigenic SP cells and 1 × 103 nontumorigenic non-SP cells were examined by histology. The SP site contained a tumor about 1 cm in diameter, whereas non-SP injection site contained no detectable tumor (Figure 4C). The tumor formed by SP cells showed the typical pathological features of breast cancer (Figure 4D), whereas only normal mouse mammary tissue was observed by histology at the site of non-SP injection (Figure 4E). Wnt signaling pathway is activated in tumors derived from SP cells The key regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, β-catenin, was first tested. The results showed that the expression of β-catenin was significantly higher in tumors derived from SP cells than that in tumors from non-SP cells at both mRNA and protein level (Figure 5). Wnt1 as an activator of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in MCF-7 cells [32] was tested with other downstream genes and proteins.

Comments are closed.