As shown in Fig. 1C, rPer a 1.0101 protein reacted to 80% (12 of 15) of the sera from cockroach allergy patients, while rPer a 1.0104 reacted to 73.3% (11 of 15) of the sera. Among the cockroach allergy patients, eight reacted to both rPer a 1.0101 and rPer a 1.0104. Both allergens did not react to the sera from 6 ragweed allergic patients and four HC. Other proteins of E. coli BL21 (DE3) did not react to the sera from cockroach Dabrafenib allergic patients (data not shown). It has been reported that German cockroach extract can activate PAR-2 [7] and that

rPer a 7 can upregulate the expression of PARs on P815 cells [8]. We therefore anticipate that rPer a 1.01 may also affect the expression of PARs on P815 cells. As expected, real-time PCR showed that rPer a 1.0101 and rPer a 1.0104 upregulated mRNA expression of PAR-1 in P815 cells at 6 h following incubation (Fig. 2A). rPer a 1.0101 and rPer a 1.0104 induced also an upregulated expression of PAR-2 (Fig. 2B) and PAR-3 (Fig. 2C) mRNAs in P815 cells. Similarly, both rPer a 1.0101 and rPer a 1.0104 elicited concentration-dependent increase in PAR-4 mRNA

expression, which started at 2 h Olaparib and reached the peak value at 6 h following incubation (Fig. 2D). Specific antibody against rPer a 1.01 blocked the rPer a 1.0101- and rPer a 1.0104-induced expression of PAR mRNAs by approximately up to 78.4% and 82.1%. To confirm influence of rPer a 1.0101 or rPer a 1.0104 on the expression of PAR proteins, immunofluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry analyses were applied. Immunofluorescent microscopy showed that rPer a 1.0101 induced an upregulated expression of PAR-1 and PAR-2, whereas rPer a 1.0104 provoked

an enhanced expression Guanylate cyclase 2C of PAR-1 and PAR-4 in P815 cells (Fig. 3A). The more detailed study with flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 3B) revealed that minimum of 1.0 μg/ml of rPer a 1.0101 or rPer a 1.0104 was required to induce significantly enhanced expression of PAR-1 or PAR-4 proteins, respectively. rPer a 1.0101 at 0.1 and 1.0 μg/ml provoked also enhanced PAR-2 expression by up to 2.5-fold (Fig. 3C). The time course study showed that rPer a 1.0101 and rPer a 1.0104 induced upregulation of expression of PARs initiated at 2 h and continuously increased until 16 h following incubation (Fig. 3D). Specific antibody against rPer a 1.01 blocked the rPer a 1.0101 induced expression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 by approximately 74.6% and 77.2%, and rPer a 1.0104 induced the expression of PAR-1 and PAR-4 by approximately up to 72.5% and 80.1%, respectively. Calcium ionophore A23187 (100 ng/ml) had little effect on the expression of PARs on P815 cells following 2-, 6- and 16-h incubation (data not shown). It has been recognized that cytokines such as Th2 cytokines play a key role in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation and that mast cells are one of major sources of cytokines.