Also, lack of financial support may have contributed to delay in procuring abortion. Women’s reasons for seeking abortion were discussed in several studies [9, 24, 29–31]. These included inappropriate timing of the pregnancy, fear of expulsion from school, financial difficulties, and uncertainties
about the Pritelivir partner. In this study, fear of expulsion from school was the most common reason for terminating pregnancy. As reported by many authors [15, 17, 30, 31], majority of patients in the present study presented late in poor general condition. This was found to be the most important factor influencing the outcome of surgical procedure as also emphasized by a number of authors [9, 15, 30]. In resource-poor countries, difficulties in diagnosis, lack of awareness of the disease and delayed referral to tertiary hospital often result in delayed presentation to a hospital Surgical intervention is considered to be the gold standard treatment for patients with bowel perforation following induced abortion [9]. In this study, all patients underwent surgical treatment which is in keeping with other studies [9, 11, 16–20, 26, 32, 33]. One of the many factors affecting the surgical outcome in patients with bowel perforation is time interval from perforation to laparotomy [9, 15]. Early
Selleckchem Doramapimod surgery can minimize the complications while delayed surgery leads to severe peritonitis and septic shock. In the present study, the majority of patients were operated more than 24 h after the onset of illness. Similar observation TH-302 mw was reported by other studies done in developing countries [4, 9, 30]. Delayed definitive surgery in the present study 4��8C may be attributed to late presentation due to lack of accessibility to health care facilities, lack of awareness of the disease as a result some patients with bowel perforation following induced abortion may decide to take medications in the pre-hospital period with hope that the symptoms will abate. It is also possible that some clinicians managing the patients initially
may not have considered perforation as a possible diagnosis leading to delayed referral to tertiary care hospital. In keeping with other studies [9, 16–20], the ileum and the sigmoid colon were the most common parts of the bowel affected. The relative fixity of these portions of the bowel has been suggested as a possible reason for this. Early surgical interference is the optimal treatment option for perforation. However, the type of surgery to be applied is controversial [9]. The surgical management of small intestinal injuries is fairly straightforward with minimal sequalae. Our practice in managing these patients is a simple closure in solitary perforations and segmental intestinal resection and primary anastomosis in multiple perforations or gangrenous bowel.