alnea, PS 9 as D. neilliae when using two closely related species, D. citri (PS

11) and D. citrichinenesis (PS 10) as out-group taxa in the combined analysis (Fig. 2). Therefore, the limit of the D. eres species complex was determined to correspond to node 19 in Fig. 2, with nine accepted species, selleckchem and D. citri and D. citrichinensis as basal lineages. Diaporthe pulla (PS 2) and D. helicis (PS 3) appeared to be closely related sister taxa and were closely related to D. eres (PS 1). However, based on the comparison of each single gene tree, these two species diverged from D. eres and each should be recognised as distinct phylogenetic species. Fig. 3 The RAxML phylogram based on combined alignment of 7 genes (ACT, Apn2, CAL, EF1-α, HIS, FG1093 and TUB) of Diaporthe eres species complex. The ML, MP bootstrap values ≥70 %, bayesian PP ≥ 0.75 are indicated above the branches. The tree is rooted with Diaporthe citri (AR3405) and D. citrichinensis (ZJUD034A,

B). Ex-type and ex-epitype cultures are in bold. Epitypes and neotypes designated in this study are indicated with a red squares Phylogenetic EPZ5676 purchase informativeness of each locus The informativeness profiles indicated that the EF1-α, Apn2 and HIS genes are the best markers to resolve the phylogenetic species included in this analysis (Fig. 4). The EF1-α and ACT genes performed the best in terms of phylogenetic informativeness per site. In comparison with the percentage parsimony informative characters of each gene (Table 2), EF1-α (16 %) and ACT (15 %) regions show a congruent result with the phylogenetic informativeness per site. Fig. 4 Profiles of phylogenetic informativeness for the 10 cryptic species compared within D. eres species complex (based on types, epitypes or taxonomically authenticated isolates) and 8 genes included in the study. a) Ultrametric tree generated from the combined analysis of Apn2, ACT, ITS, EF1-α, TUB, learn more CAL, FG1093 and HIS genes b) Net Phylogenetic informativeness c) Phylogenetic informativeness per site. d) key Taxonomy Based on the phylogenetic analyses, the type species of Diaporthe, D. eres, is circumscribed along with eleven closely related but phylogenetically

distinct lineages, each of which is briefly described and illustrated. If a modern description already exists, a reference is given and the species is Apoptosis inhibitor provided with host association, distribution and notes on taxonomy and phylogeny. As listed after the descriptions, type and additional specimens were observed for each species. Epitype specimens were designated for six species. In addition, ex-type, ex-epitype, and additional cultures were observed, if available. Diaporthe eres Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 245 (1870), nom. cons. prop. Fig. 5 Fig. 5 Morphology of Diaporthe eres a. Pycnidia on alfalfa stem on WA b. pycnidial necks protruding on alfalfa stem c. conidiophores d, e. α- conidia f. β- conidia g. Ectostroma on the dead twigs of Ulmus sp. h. Perithecia i. Ascomata in section j–q.