8; 95% CI, 1.41-24.07) and with lower blood pressure at hospital admission (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.93 for each
mm Hg). Patients brought by EMS had trends toward a lower door-to-neuroimaging time and a higher frequency of thrombolysis therapy (13% in EMS users vs 5% in patients arriving by their own means; P = .10). Our data demonstrate that in a Brazilian population with acute ischemic stroke, the patients with selleckchem more severe stroke, those with atrial fibrillation, and those with lower blood pressure at hospital presentation were more likely to use EMS. EMS use was associated with trends toward a lower door-to-neuroimaging time and a higher frequency of thrombolysis therapy.”
“Objectives: The present study is aimed at figuring out the status of new-born hearing screening program being conducted in India, estimate the use of different screening instruments used and tests practiced, study the role of various professionals involved and document the current practices of audiologists IPI-145 ic106 in the country.
Method: A questionnaire on “”Newborn Hearing Screening Survey”" was sent to 185 institutions
(165 medical colleges and 20 Speech and hearing centers) all over India and the information gathered was subjected to appropriate analyses.
Results: On a 16.75% return rate of the questionnaire, almost half of the colleges have their annual birthing census more than 2000. The majority of sites (57.13%) report an average length of stay for a vaginal delivery to be more than
24 hours with 78.94% also reporting of a NICU of Level II/III type. Only 38.09% of the medical colleges have Ro-3306 a universal Newborn Hearing screening program (NBHS) in comparison to 80% of the Speech and Hearing centers. Again 43.8% of the medical colleges who conduct NBHS program have an audiologist and majority of them work towards screening. Almost 63% of the speech and hearing centers use physiological tests like ABR, OAE or their combination to screen newborns. Both medical and speech and hearing organizations prefer that the audiologist inform and even give a written material regarding the results of the tests to the parents. Only 62.65% of the institutions refer less than 11% of their clients for further testing at the time of discharge. In 50% of the medical colleges the results of a test are reported to the parents and primary care physicians/doctors and in 37.5% of the speech and hearing centers the results are informed to the parents.
Conclusions: While keeping in mind the incidence of hearing impairment in the neonatal population of India, the results of this survey warrant the need for an urgent implementation of universal neonatal hearing screening in all the health care facilities in the country, at large. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“The potential impact of stem cell technology on medical and dental practice is vast.