7%); and EUS-FNA, in 31 patients (86 1%) In patients with negati

7%); and EUS-FNA, in 31 patients (86.1%). In patients with negative biopsy results, the second procedure was performed. The results of EUS-FNA were positive in 9 patients and of EBUS-TBNA-in none. Of 17 patients with negative results of both procedures, MS was performed in 6 patients and was positive in 2. In the remaining 11 patients, sarcoidosis was confirmed by TBLB. Sensitivity and accuracy of TBNA compared with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA were 62.5% and 64.7%, 79.3% and 80%, and 88.6% and 88.9%, respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were higher (P = 0.139) and of EUS-FNA were significantly higher compared with TBNA (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS

In stages I and II of pulmonary sarcoidosis, endoscopic ultrasound is a reasonable approach but EUS-FNA seems

to be the method of choice.”
“We describe a phenotype-driven mutagenesis selleck chemical screen in which mice carrying a targeted mutation are bred with ENU-treated males in order to provide a sensitized system for detecting dominant modifier mutations. The presence of initial mutation renders the screening system more responsive to subtle changes in modifier genes that would not be penetrant in an otherwise wild type background. We utilized two mutant mouse models: 1) mice carrying a mutation in growth hormone releasing hormone receptor (Ghrhr) (denoted ‘lit’ allele, Ghrhr(lit)), which results in GH deficiency; and 2) mice lacking Smad2 gene, a signal transducer for TGF-beta, an important bone click here growth factor. The Smad2(-/-) mice are lethal and Ghrhr(lit/lit) mice are dwarf, but both Sinad2(+/-) and Ghrhr(lit/+) mice exhibit normal growth. We injected 6-7 weeks old C57BL/6J male mice with ENU (100 mg/kg dose) and bred them with Ghrhr(lit/+) and Smad2(+/-) mice.

The F1 mice with Ghrhr(lit/+) or Smad2(+/-) genotype were screened for growth and skeletal phenotypes. An outlier was identified as > 3 SD units different from wild type control (n=20-30). We screened about 100 F1 mice with Ghrhr(lit/+) and Smad2(+/-) genotypes and identified nine outliers. A backcross established heritability of three mutant lines in multiple generations. Among the phenotypic deviants, we have identified a mutant mouse with 30-40% reduced bone size. The U0126 molecular weight magnitude of the bone size phenotype was amplified by the presence of one copy of the disrupted Ghrhr gene as determined by the 2-way ANOVA (p < 0.02 for interaction). Thus, a new mouse model has been established to identify a gene that interacts with GH signaling to regulate bone size. In addition, the sensitized screen also demonstrated higher recovery of skeletal phenotypes as compared to that obtained in the classical ENU screen in wild type mice. The discovery of mutants in a selected pathway will provide a valuable tool to not only to discover novel genes involved in a particular process but will also prove useful for the elucidation of the biology of that process. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Comments are closed.