, 2000). In the current study, however, only the duration and gap deviants elicited prominent MMN-like responses, whereas the other deviant types

did not (see also Putkinen et al., 2012). Other studies have also failed to obtain MMNs to frequency (Gomes et al., 2000; Morr et al., 2002) and intensity (Sussman ALK inhibitor & Steinschneider, 2011) deviants in passive odd-ball setting even in children who were older than those participating in the current study [note, however, that in the study of Sussman & Steinschneider (2011) a frequency MMN was obtained]. Therefore, the MMN appears to be less robust in children than in adults and its maturational time-course might vary between different auditory features. Auditory experience is known to influence the MMN in childhood and therefore it was expected that the MMN amplitude would correlate with the overall score for musical activities at home. However, no such correlation was found. The evidence for experience-dependent plasticity on the MMN mainly comes from studies that, unlike the current one, centre on the influence of the language environment (e.g. Cheour et al., 2002) or the effects of intense formal musical training in school-aged children

on auditory discrimination (Chobert et al., 2011; Meyer et al., 2011; Virtala et al., 2012). The current study indicates tentatively that, in contrast to these types of auditory experiences, the MMN might not be sensitive to differences in the kinds of informal musical experience examined in the current study at least in 2–3-year-olds. As was the case with the MMN, the duration and gap deviants were also Selleckchem Regorafenib the only ones Vasopressin Receptor out of the five deviant types that elicited a P3a-like response. Unlike the MMN, however, these responses were correlated

with the overall musical activities at home score. Interestingly, contrasting results were obtained with regard to the P3as elicited by the deviant tones and novel sounds. Namely, the musical activities at home were associated with augmented P3a responses to the deviant tones but a reduced P3a to the novel sounds. At least in the current experimental setting, a P3a-like response to the deviant tones might reflect the sensitivity to fine variation in the auditory environment, whereas the novel-sound P3a might be related to distractibility by salient auditory changes. Evidence from various sources supports the intuitive idea that, in the sense just outlined, the P3a responses to subtle vs. pronounced auditory changes might reflect different aspects of attention allocation. Firstly, short-term auditory training has been found to enhance the P3a elicited by different types of subtle auditory changes (Atienza et al., 2004; Uther et al., 2006) and augmented P3as to difficult-to-detect deviants are seen in subjects with highly accurate auditory abilities such as musicians (e.g. Vuust et al., 2009).