, 1991, Sharp et al., 1996, Skaggs et al., 1995, Touretzky and Redish, 1996 and Zhang, 1996) and the activity bump is moved in accordance

with changes in the animal’s head orientation (Figure 3A). The dynamics of space-modulated cells can be modeled on a two-dimensional neural sheet where cells are arranged according to the location of their firing fields and the activity bump is moved in accordance with the animal’s direction and speed of movement (Samsonovich and McNaughton, 1997 and Zhang, 1996). The two-dimensional model was originally proposed as a mechanism for spatial representation Autophagy inhibitor purchase by place cells, but, like the oscillatory-interference model of O’Keefe and Recce (1993), the model implicitly predicted periodic firing fields. With the discovery of grid cells, this model could also be translated to entorhinal networks. One of the earliest attractor models of grid cells used a self-organized pattern of activity that, if displaced across medial entorhinal Everolimus neurons in concordance with the movements of the rat, imprinted a grid map to each of its neurons (Fuhs and Touretzky, 2006). Multiple “bumps” of activity emerged as a consequence of concentric ripples of positive and negative

connections. To support translocation of the activity, each cell was assigned a preferred head direction. The bumps of activity were then displaced based on both velocity input to units with the appropriate head direction preference and asymmetric inhibition enforcing a single direction of movement (Fuhs and Touretzky, 2006). Navigation over small timescales resulted in the successful generation of grid cell patterns; however,

population activity was constructed using biologically unrealistic piecewise trajectories. Spiking activity was plotted for a small sampled portion of the environment, and the network activity was then reset before the next sample. This resulted in the grid pattern falling apart when realistic trajectories over longer periods of time were used (for more detail, see Burak and Fiete, 2006). Another concern was that the initial connectivity used in the Fuhs and Touretzky model led to overwhelming excitation near the borders of the environment, causing neurons to fire over the entire environmental boundary. Disruption of path integration then occurred as avoiding PD184352 (CI-1040) these edge effects required significant attenuation of the recurrent activity near the borders, which caused distortions and rotations in the population pattern. Edge effects in attractor networks can be avoided by supposing that neurons at the edges of the network connect with neurons on the opposite edges, resulting in periodic boundaries (Figure 3B). Periodic boundaries effectively turn the network into a torus shape of connectivity and naturally cause the firing fields of neurons on the attractor map to repeat at regular intervals (McNaughton et al., 1996 and Samsonovich and McNaughton, 1997) (Figure 3B).