All authors read and approved the final version.”
“Background Biofouling is a colonisation process that begins from the very same moment a material surface is immersed in seawater and leads to the development of complex

biological communities. This undesirable accumulation of biological material causes severe economic losses to human activities in the sea, from deterioration of materials, structures, and devices, MGCD0103 in vivo to increases in fuel consumption and loss of maneuverability in ships [1, 2]. In a simplified model, there are four main stages in the biofouling process: i) adsorption of organic matter onto the material surface, creating a conditioning film; ii) arrival of the so-called primary colonizers (bacteria and diatoms, mainly) that form complex, multispecies biofilms; iii) settlement of spores of macroscopic algae and other secondary colonisers; and iv) settlement of invertebrate larvae [3]. Even though it is not necessarily a sequential process, it is generally accepted that the formation of an organic layer and a biofilm is the first step to biofouling [4]. Since the ban on the use of organotin compounds, particularly bis-(tris-n-butyltin) oxide (TBTO), established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) that finally entered into force in September selleck kinase inhibitor 2008, there is a clear need for alternative antifouling compounds. We have recently started a screening program for the search of novel antifouling molecules. In doing so,

one of the most

striking issues is the great diversity of conditions currently employed in lab-scale assays (i.e., culture media, inocula, incubation times and temperatures), not only when dealing with biofilms, in whose case the optimal conditions should be individually defined for each strain, but even with planktonic cultures [5–11]. It seems evident that this heterogeneity may lead to important differences in the results obtained from in vitro tests. In addition, there is a lack of studies focusing on the effect that these diverse conditions have on the properties of marine biofilms. Even though single-strain laboratory tests do Amylase not mimic the real environmental conditions, in vitro models are a useful tool for screening and comparing new products, treatments and materials. To this end, S. algae was chosen as model organism. Shewanella spp. are gram-negative, facultative anaerobe rod-shaped uniflagellar bacteria worldwide distributed in marine and even freshwater habitats (Figure 1) [12, 13]. They play an important role in the biogeochemical cycles of C, N and S [13] due to their unparalleled ability to use around twenty Ganetespib cost different compounds as final electron acceptors in respiration, which, in turn, provides bacteria the ability to survive in a wide array of environments [14]. For this versatility, shewanellae have been focus of much attention in the bioremediation of halogenated organic compounds, nitramines, heavy metals and nuclear wastes [14].