Participants were also asked whether they were aware of the risk of malaria infection in their home country and if they or their children have been affected by malaria. Results were stratified by parents’ home continent. Differences in responses regarding malaria prophylaxis were evaluated by contingency table analysis by the use of the χ2 test. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software package (SPSS 11.5, Chicago, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

A total of 71 parents and their children fulfilled the Selleck PD0325901 inclusion criteria and their responses were analyzed in this study. The parents’ origin continents were Asia (n := 45; 63.4%), Africa (n = 25; 35.2%), and the Caribbean (n = 1; 1.4%). The origin country is detailed in Table 1. Fifty-nine (83.1%) and 32 (45.1%) parents were aware of the selleck chemical malaria risk in their native country and of the need for fever investigation on return after travel, respectively. Compared to parents of Asian origin, parents of African origin were more likely to be aware of the

malaria risk (p = 0.019) and of the need for fever work-up post-travel (p = 0.04). Median children’s age was 3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–8), 41 (57.7%) were males. Fifty-five (77.5%) children were born in Italy. Forty-one (57.7%) children had traveled to their parents’ home country (median stay duration: 1 month; IQR: 1–2); 25 (61%) children had resided in a rural area, 11 (26.8%) in an urban area, and 5 (12.2%) in both. Non-pharmacological prophylaxis (repellents, insecticides, nets, and insecticide-treated nets) was used in 30 (73.1%) children. All the eight (19.5%) children, who had received pharmacological malaria prophylaxis, have had a previous

pre-travel encounter with a doctor. Mefloquine was the most used drug (6/8, 75%). Seven out of eight (87.5%) Wilson disease protein children completed prophylaxis appropriately. Side effects to the drug (nausea, vomit, and dizziness) were reported in one patient (12.5%). A significantly lower proportion of children traveling to Asia compared to children traveling to Africa (3/30 = 10% vs 5/11 = 46%, p = 0.036) had received pharmacological prophylaxis. The proportion of children receiving prophylaxis was not different considering area of staying (rural, urban, or both) (p = 0.760), age (≤2 years or >2 years) (p = 0.521), and gender (p = 0.422). A total of eight (19.5%) parents (one Asian and seven Africans) and one (2.4%) Asian child reported to be affected by malaria while abroad. No subjects developed malaria after his/her return to Italy. These findings, stratified by region of origin, are detailed in Table 2. In our study, 60% of children born to immigrants from malaria-endemic countries had traveled to their parents’ home country on at least one occasion.